Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q114
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 114

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination eBook
Type SSBA
UUID 3d0b9f78-72e0-4664-bc54-5ca7ecf4d0bd

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
Major haemorrhage
Subtopic 3
Resuscitation
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A woman at 37 weeks presents with massive APH. She is shocked, with ongoing heavy bleeding while emergency resuscitation is commenced. Which approach to oxygen therapy is most appropriate in this setting?
Question Stem
—

Options

A A) Avoid oxygen because maternal hyperoxia may reduce uteroplacental perfusion
B B) Give oxygen only after laboratory confirmation of anaemia
C C) Delay oxygen until fetal monitoring has been established
D D) Administer high-concentration oxygen as part of immediate resuscitation
E E) Oxygen is indicated only if the fetus develops bradycardia

Explanation

Massive APH with maternal shock is a life-threatening emergency requiring immediate resuscitation according to airway, breathing and circulation principles. High-concentration oxygen forms part of the initial management of major haemorrhage while vascular access, blood sampling, fluid and blood-component replacement and definitive obstetric management are organised. Maternal resuscitation should not be delayed for laboratory investigations or fetal monitoring.

Option Validity

A) In maternal shock, correction of maternal hypoxia and optimisation of oxygen delivery take priority.

B) Oxygen therapy in shock does not depend on laboratory confirmation of anaemia.

C) Fetal monitoring must not delay maternal resuscitation.

E) The indication arises from maternal major haemorrhage and shock, not solely fetal bradycardia.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
eBook
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question