Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q155
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 155

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination eBook
Type SSBA
UUID 5ee39337-c0d4-4f3a-8e47-70a3183e056c

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
Local
Subtopic 3
Assessment
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A woman at 35 weeks presents with recurrent small-volume APH. Placental location is normal. She has no abdominal pain, uterine tenderness or contractions, and fetal assessment is reassuring. Speculum examination demonstrates an abnormal friable cervical lesion that bleeds on contact. Which interpretation is most appropriate?
Question Stem
—

Options

A A local genital-tract cause has been demonstrated, but maternal and fetal assessment of the APH remains necessary
B The cervical lesion proves that placental abruption cannot coexist
C The lesion should be ignored because cervical abnormalities cannot cause APH
D Digital vaginal examination is now mandatory to exclude concealed placental bleeding
E Identification of a cervical source makes fetal assessment unnecessary

Explanation

APH may arise from causes other than placenta praevia or placental abruption, including cervical and vaginal pathology. Speculum examination can therefore be diagnostically useful and may identify a local source of bleeding. However, identifying such a lesion does not justify abandoning appropriate maternal and fetal assessment, particularly when the woman has recurrent APH. Clinical assessment must integrate the apparent source, severity of bleeding, maternal condition and fetal wellbeing rather than treating one examination finding as absolute proof that no additional obstetric pathology exists.

Option Validity

B) Identification of a cervical source of bleeding does not prove that a separate obstetric pathology cannot coexist.

C) Cervical and vaginal pathology are recognised non-placental causes of antepartum haemorrhage.

D) Digital vaginal examination is not a diagnostic test for concealed placental haemorrhage and remains subject to appropriate precautions regarding placental location.

E) Appropriate fetal assessment remains part of the evaluation of antepartum haemorrhage despite identification of an apparent local source.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
eBook
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question