Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q162
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 162

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type SSBA
UUID 6d922a53-a801-4a7f-9f7b-a0bb3c80681b

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
Placental abruption
Subtopic 3
Diagnosis
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A woman at 36 weeks presents with sudden abdominal pain and a small amount of vaginal bleeding. Her uterus is tender and persistently tense. CTG shows fetal tachycardia with recurrent decelerations. Ultrasound demonstrates an anterior placenta clear of the cervix but no retroplacental collection. Kleihauer testing is negative. Which combination of findings should carry the greatest diagnostic weight?
Question Stem
—

Options

A Negative ultrasound and negative Kleihauer test, making abruption unlikely
B Small measured blood loss and absence of placenta praevia, making a cervical cause most likely
C Negative Kleihauer test and normally located placenta, excluding a placental cause
D Absence of a visible retroplacental clot, requiring another diagnosis before treatment
E Pain, uterine hypertonicity and fetal compromise, supporting a clinical diagnosis of placental abruption despite negative investigations

Explanation

Placental abruption is fundamentally a clinical diagnosis. Sudden pain, uterine tenderness or hypertonicity and fetal compromise provide a compelling clinical constellation even when external bleeding is limited. Ultrasound has poor sensitivity for retroplacental clot, so a negative scan cannot exclude abruption. Likewise, the Kleihauer test is used to quantify fetomaternal haemorrhage for anti-D management in RhD-negative women and is not a diagnostic test for abruption. The question therefore requires integration of the clinical findings rather than allowing two low-exclusion-value investigations to overrule a strongly suggestive presentation.

Option Validity

A) Neither a negative ultrasound nor a negative Kleihauer test reliably excludes placental abruption.

B) Visible blood loss may substantially underestimate concealed haemorrhage, and exclusion of placenta praevia does not establish a cervical source.

C) A normally located placenta does not exclude placental abruption, and Kleihauer testing is not a diagnostic test for abruption.

D) Necessary management should not be delayed awaiting imaging confirmation when the clinical presentation strongly supports placental abruption.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question