Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q169
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 169

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type SSBA
UUID 4e62efb5-aeed-492a-9354-1d214921b9f8

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
General
Subtopic 3
Management
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A woman at 28+6 weeks presents with 60 mL APH and regular contractions. Placenta praevia has been excluded. She is haemodynamically stable, the uterus is soft between contractions and CTG is reassuring. There is no clinical evidence of placental abruption. The cervix has changed from 1 cm to 2 cm over two hours. She has received her first dose of antenatal corticosteroids. Which is the most defensible management regarding tocolysis?
Question Stem
—

Options

A Tocolysis is mandatory because she is below 30 weeks
B APH is an absolute contraindication to all tocolytic therapy
C Tocolysis should be continued irrespective of subsequent maternal or fetal deterioration until corticosteroids are complete
D Selective tocolysis may be considered under senior obstetric supervision provided no maternal or fetal indication for delivery develops
E Tocolysis should be withheld until the bleeding reaches the definition of massive haemorrhage

Explanation

APH does not constitute an absolute contraindication to tocolysis in every circumstance. In a carefully selected preterm woman who is stable, has reassuring fetal assessment and has no evidence of placental abruption or other indication for immediate delivery, short-term tocolysis may be considered under senior obstetric supervision. The potential benefit is pregnancy prolongation, including time for antenatal corticosteroid effect. However, the decision must remain dynamic: increasing haemorrhage, suspected abruption or maternal/fetal compromise would remove the justification for delaying delivery.

Option Validity

A) Preterm gestation alone does not make tocolysis mandatory.

B) APH is not an absolute contraindication in every clinically selected case.

C) Maternal or fetal deterioration would require reassessment and may mandate delivery rather than continued tocolysis.

E) The decision is based on the overall clinical situation, not on waiting for a massive-haemorrhage threshold.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question