Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q195
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 195

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type SSBA
UUID 5167590e-99d1-4222-adca-53a60fc8a7cb

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
Local
Subtopic 3
Assessment
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A woman at 30 weeks presents with recurrent postcoital APH. Placental location is normal, fetal assessment is reassuring and the uterus is soft and non-tender. Speculum examination demonstrates an irregular friable cervical lesion. Review of her records shows previous abnormal cervical cytology with incomplete follow-up. What is the most appropriate next diagnostic step?
Question Stem
—

Options

A Reassure her that pregnancy-related ectropion is the most likely explanation and defer assessment until postpartum
B Perform a digital examination repeatedly to determine whether the lesion bleeds on contact
C Diagnose placenta praevia despite the normal placental location
D Treat empirically as placental abruption because cervical malignancy rarely presents with APH
E Refer for colposcopic evaluation of the suspicious cervix

Explanation

APH is not always placental. Previous cervical smear history is relevant because symptomatic cervical cancer in pregnancy may present with APH, often as postcoital bleeding or vaginal discharge. When speculum examination demonstrates a clinically suspicious cervix, referral for colposcopic evaluation is recommended in accordance with cervical pathology guidance. A visible lesion should therefore not automatically be attributed to physiological ectropion, particularly in the presence of abnormal previous cytology.

Option Validity

A) A clinically suspicious cervical lesion with abnormal previous cytology should not simply be deferred until after pregnancy.

B) Repeated digital examination is not the appropriate diagnostic evaluation of a suspicious cervical lesion.

C) A normal placental location and direct visualization of a cervical lesion do not support placenta praevia.

D) Cervical malignancy is uncommon but may present with APH, especially postcoital bleeding, and must be appropriately assessed.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question