Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. EMQ
  4. Q236
EMQ

EMQ — Extended Matching Question · Review

Question 236

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type EEMQ
UUID 2a527a36-91ad-4037-872a-4cd8bfb8e1f0

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
Vasa praevia
Subtopic 3
Diagnosis
Question Type
EMQ

Question

EEMQ
Question Header
Select the single most likely diagnosis.
Question Stem
A 32-year-old primigravida at 38+1 weeks is admitted in spontaneous labour. Pregnancy has been uncomplicated and the placenta is not praevia. Shortly after spontaneous rupture of the membranes, there is a relatively small amount of fresh vaginal bleeding. Maternal pulse and blood pressure remain normal and she has no abdominal pain or uterine tenderness. Within minutes, the previously normal fetal heart-rate pattern deteriorates abruptly, with profound persistent fetal bradycardia. The degree of fetal compromise appears markedly disproportionate to the mother's clinical condition and the observed maternal blood loss.

Answer Bank

A Placental abruption
B Cervical ectropion
C Placenta praevia
D Bloody show associated with labour
E Uterine rupture
F Unexplained antepartum haemorrhage
G Vasa praevia
H Cervical malignancy

Correct Answer

G. Vasa praevia

Explanation

Bleeding beginning immediately after rupture of the membranes followed by sudden severe fetal compromise, while the mother remains haemodynamically well, should raise strong suspicion of ruptured vasa praevia. The crucial discriminator is the disproportion between the relatively preserved maternal condition and profound fetal deterioration. In APH associated with spontaneous or artificial rupture of the membranes, vasa praevia must be considered because the blood loss may be fetal rather than maternal.

Option Validity

A) Placental abruption more typically produces maternal abdominal pain, uterine tenderness or hypertonicity and maternal bleeding may be concealed.

B) Cervical ectropion may cause contact bleeding but does not explain abrupt profound fetal deterioration following membrane rupture.

C) Placenta praevia classically causes painless maternal bleeding but does not characteristically produce this membrane-rupture-associated pattern with disproportionate fetal collapse.

D) A normal bloody show should not cause profound persistent fetal bradycardia.

E) Uterine rupture usually occurs in a different clinical context and commonly produces maternal and abdominal features in addition to fetal compromise.

F) The temporal relationship to membrane rupture and disproportionate fetal compromise provides a specific diagnostic clue rather than supporting an unexplained classification.

H) Cervical malignancy may cause bleeding but does not explain the abrupt fetal deterioration immediately after membrane rupture.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question