Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. EMQ
  4. Q269
EMQ

EMQ — Extended Matching Question · Review

Question 269

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type EEMQ
UUID 87e24eb8-d92e-4e8d-a386-3f06cf6f01b5

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
Placenta praevia
Subtopic 3
Previous caesarean risk
Question Type
EMQ

Question

EEMQ
Question Header
Select the single most appropriate interpretation of her operative obstetric history.
Question Stem
A 40-year-old G6P4 attends following a painless APH at 28+6 weeks. She has had three previous caesarean births and one surgical uterine evacuation. The current pregnancy followed assisted conception. Ultrasound confirms a low-lying placenta requiring further localisation. A trainee suggests that previous caesarean birth is relevant only to abnormal placental adherence and has no importance when assessing the likelihood of placenta praevia itself.

Answer Bank

A Previous caesarean birth has no association with placenta praevia
B Caesarean history matters only after five previous operations
C Previous caesarean birth predicts placental abruption rather than praevia
D Caesarean history becomes relevant only after APH exceeds 500 mL
E Previous uterine surgery is relevant only when the placenta is posterior
F Previous caesarean birth is a recognised risk factor for placenta praevia and is clinically relevant alongside her other implantation-related risks
G Assisted conception eliminates the relevance of previous caesarean birth
H Maternal age is the only recognised risk factor in this history

Correct Answer

F. Previous caesarean birth is a recognised risk factor for placenta praevia and is clinically relevant alongside her other implantation-related risks

Explanation

Previous caesarean birth is a recognised risk factor for placenta praevia. This woman has several additional recognised associations, including advanced maternal age, multiparity, previous uterine instrumentation and assisted conception. Her operative history is therefore directly relevant to the probability of placenta praevia and should not be restricted conceptually to abnormal placental adherence.

Option Validity

A) Previous caesarean birth is a recognised risk factor for placenta praevia.

B) The association is not confined to women with five or more previous operations.

C) Caesarean birth is directly relevant to placenta praevia risk.

D) Risk assessment is relevant independently of the volume of a subsequent haemorrhage.

E) The association is not restricted to posterior placentation.

G) Assisted conception adds another risk association rather than cancelling the relevance of caesarean history.

H) Maternal age is one of several relevant factors in this patient.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question