Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. EMQ
  4. Q58
EMQ

EMQ — Extended Matching Question · Review

Question 58

Feto-maternal medicine → Maturity

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type EEMQ
UUID df5c20f5-6544-4bee-888e-5781e6f2c036

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Feto-maternal medicine
Topic
Maturity
Subtopic 1
Related issue
Subtopic 2
Steroid
Subtopic 3
Planned caesarean birth
Question Type
EMQ

Question

EEMQ
Question Header
Which of the following is the most appropriate approach to antenatal corticosteroid administration?
Question Stem
A woman at 38+0 weeks’ gestation is scheduled for an elective caesarean birth before 39 weeks for a non-urgent obstetric indication. She asks whether antenatal corticosteroids should be given.

Answer Bank

A Routinely administer corticosteroids because they definitively prevent respiratory distress syndrome at term
B Withhold corticosteroids because they have no respiratory effect after 37 weeks
C Give corticosteroids only after fetal lung maturity testing
D Give repeated weekly corticosteroid courses until the caesarean birth
E Administer corticosteroids because long-term childhood safety at term is definitively established
F Delay the caesarean birth solely to complete multiple corticosteroid courses
G Discuss the uncertain balance of possible respiratory benefit and potential harms, including neonatal hypoglycaemia and uncertainty about longer-term effects
H Administer corticosteroids only if the woman has diabetes

Correct Answer

G) Discuss the uncertain balance of possible respiratory benefit and potential harms, including neonatal hypoglycaemia and uncertainty about longer-term effects

Explanation

For planned caesarean birth between 37+0 and 38+6 weeks, antenatal corticosteroid administration requires individualised informed discussion rather than routine treatment. Available evidence suggests that corticosteroids may reduce admission to a neonatal unit for respiratory morbidity, but the magnitude and consistency of benefit for specific outcomes such as respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnoea of the newborn and overall neonatal-unit admission remain uncertain. Treatment can also increase neonatal hypoglycaemia, and observational data raise uncertainty about possible longer-term developmental effects when children exposed to antenatal corticosteroids are ultimately born at term. Consequently, corticosteroids should not be presented as providing a proven net benefit for every planned early-term caesarean birth. At 38+0 weeks the woman should receive balanced counselling about these uncertainties and potential trade-offs. Fetal lung maturity testing, routine repeated courses and claims of established long-term safety are not appropriate substitutes for informed shared decision-making.

Option Validity

A) A definitive reduction in respiratory distress syndrome at early term has not been established.

B) Possible respiratory benefit has been reported after 37 weeks in planned caesarean birth.

C) Fetal lung maturity testing is not required as the basis for treatment.

D) Routine repeated weekly corticosteroid courses are not recommended.

E) Long-term childhood safety after term exposure is not definitively established.

F) Caesarean birth should not be delayed solely to permit multiple corticosteroid courses.

H) Consideration of treatment is not restricted to women with diabetes.

Further Reading

Stock SJ, Thomson AJ, Papworth S, on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Antenatal corticosteroids to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. BJOG. 2022;129:e35–e60. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 74. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17027.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
Antenatal corticosteroids to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality
Source Section
Planned caesarean birth at term
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question