Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q71
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 71

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination eBook
Type SSBA
UUID 231232af-194b-46cc-bb60-84068aead695

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
Major haemorrhage
Subtopic 3
Resuscitation
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A woman at 36 weeks arrives with heavy vaginal bleeding, pulse 130 beats/min and blood pressure 75/45 mmHg. The fetal heart is present. Which approach to fetal assessment is most appropriate during initial management?
Question Stem
—

Options

A Delay maternal resuscitation until a complete CTG has been interpreted
B Perform fetal blood sampling before establishing intravenous access
C Commence maternal resuscitation while assessing fetal wellbeing
D Perform ultrasound biophysical profiling before giving intravenous fluids
E Assess the fetus only after maternal haemodynamic parameters have completely normalised

Explanation

Severe APH requires immediate maternal resuscitation. Maternal and fetal assessment should proceed in parallel where possible, but maternal stabilisation takes priority because fetal wellbeing depends upon adequate maternal circulation. Fetal heart assessment and CTG can provide important information regarding fetal compromise, but investigations must not delay resuscitation of a haemodynamically unstable woman.

Option Validity

A) . CTG assessment must not delay maternal resuscitation.

B) . invasive fetal assessment must not precede emergency maternal stabilisation.

D) . biophysical profiling would delay essential resuscitation.

E) . fetal assessment can occur concurrently; complete maternal normalisation is not required before assessing fetal wellbeing.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
eBook
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question