Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q97
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 97

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type SSBA
UUID 40e4fd6c-4232-4c60-9265-8e68df84308a

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
Local
Subtopic 3
Assessment
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A woman at 32 weeks presents with a small amount of vaginal bleeding. She is stable and has no abdominal pain. Placenta praevia has been excluded on ultrasound. Which examination is useful for identifying a cervical or lower genital tract source of bleeding?
Question Stem
—

Options

A Digital rectal examination
B Speculum examination
C Routine digital cervical examination
D Bimanual examination under anaesthesia
E Amnioscopic examination

Explanation

Speculum examination can help identify non-placental causes of APH arising from the cervix or lower genital tract and may provide information about cervical dilatation. Digital vaginal examination requires particular caution when placenta praevia has not been excluded because manipulation may provoke severe bleeding. In this case placental location is already known, but a speculum examination remains the appropriate targeted examination for identifying a visible local source of bleeding.

Option Validity

A) rectal examination is not the appropriate method for identifying a cervical or vaginal source of APH.

C) digital examination is not the primary examination for visual identification of lower genital tract lesions.

D) examination under anaesthesia is unnecessary in a stable woman requiring routine assessment of a possible local source.

E) amnioscopy is not the appropriate investigation for identifying cervical or vaginal causes of APH.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question