Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. EMQ
  4. Q31
EMQ

EMQ — Extended Matching Question · Review

Question 31

Feto-maternal medicine → Perinatology

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type EEMQ
UUID 9084143a-6aa2-4b93-86de-470169abb443

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Feto-maternal medicine
Topic
Perinatology
Subtopic 1
Diagnosis
Subtopic 2
Invasive
Subtopic 3
CVS
Question Type
EMQ

Question

EEMQ
Question Header
Which of the following is the most appropriate next step before an irreversible pregnancy decision?
Question Stem
A woman undergoes chorionic villus sampling after a high-risk screening result. Rapid testing suggests a chromosomal abnormality, but ultrasound shows no structural fetal abnormality.

Answer Bank

A Make the pregnancy decision from the rapid result alone
B Await the full karyotype result
C Repeat chorionic villus sampling immediately
D Arrange routine amniocentesis at 20 weeks
E Repeat the rapid test on maternal blood
F Ignore the result because chorionic villus sampling is unreliable
G Arrange fetal MRI
H Repeat ultrasound in four weeks and take no further genetic action

Correct Answer

B) Await the full karyotype result

Explanation

Chorionic villus sampling examines placental tissue and can therefore be affected by confined placental mosaicism. RCOG notes that confined placental mosaicism occurs in approximately 1-2% of CVS samples. Where rapid testing such as QF-PCR suggests a chromosomal abnormality but there is no corresponding structural fetal abnormality, the full karyotype should be awaited before an irreversible pregnancy decision is made. This reduces the risk of acting on a result that reflects the placenta rather than the fetus. Immediate repeat CVS or unrelated imaging does not resolve the underlying issue as appropriately as confirmatory cytogenetic assessment.

Option Validity

A) A rapid result alone may be misleading because of confined placental mosaicism.

C) Immediate repeat CVS samples placental tissue again and is not the recommended first response.

D) Routine delay until 20 weeks is not the recommended confirmatory strategy.

E) Maternal blood testing does not provide the required confirmation of the fetal karyotype.

F) CVS is a definitive diagnostic procedure but has recognised limitations including confined placental mosaicism.

G) Fetal MRI does not confirm the chromosomal result.

H) Ultrasound surveillance alone does not provide cytogenetic confirmation.

Further Reading

Navaratnam K, Alfirevic Z; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: Green-top Guideline No. 8. BJOG 2022;129:e1-e15. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16821.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
9.50
Destination
Site
Source
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: Green-top Guideline No. 8
Source Section
Timing of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling
Source Locator
RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 8, October 2021
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question