Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. EMQ
  4. Q32
EMQ

EMQ — Extended Matching Question · Review

Question 32

Feto-maternal medicine → Multiple pregnancy

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination eBook
Type EEMQ
UUID 9b197a75-0744-4297-8f34-d771083bb6c3

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Feto-maternal medicine
Topic
Multiple pregnancy
Subtopic 1
Diagnosis
Subtopic 2
Invasive
Subtopic 3
Fetal mapping
Question Type
EMQ

Question

EEMQ
Question Header
Which of the following is the most appropriate method of documenting fetal identity during the procedure?
Question Stem
A dichorionic twin pregnancy requires invasive prenatal diagnosis. Both fetuses appear similar on ultrasound and there are no obvious distinguishing structural features.

Answer Bank

A Label the fetuses twin 1 and twin 2 only
B Label the fetuses according to estimated fetal weight
C Label the fetuses according to sex whenever possible
D Use fixed maternal anatomical orientation such as left/right or upper/lower
E Label the fetuses according to sampling order
F Use placental size to identify each fetus
G Use alphabetical labels without anatomical reference
H No formal mapping is required in dichorionic twins

Correct Answer

D) Use fixed maternal anatomical orientation such as left/right or upper/lower

Explanation

Accurate fetal mapping is essential when invasive prenatal diagnosis is performed in a multiple pregnancy. RCOG recommends documenting fetal positions using a fixed maternal anatomical orientation, for example maternal left and right or upper and lower, rather than relying only on numerical labels. Numerical designations may become ambiguous as fetal positions change. When there are no distinguishing fetal features, two operators should confirm the labelling of samples. Reliable mapping is particularly important because any subsequent selective intervention must be directed to the correct fetus. Sampling order, fetal weight or arbitrary alphabetical labels are less robust than a reproducible maternal anatomical reference.

Option Validity

A) Numerical labels alone may become ambiguous as fetal positions change.

B) Estimated fetal weight is not a sufficiently reliable identifier.

C) Fetal sex may not distinguish the fetuses and is not the recommended mapping system.

E) Sampling order alone does not provide reliable continuing fetal identification.

F) Placental size is not the recommended fetal mapping method.

G) Arbitrary alphabetical labels without anatomical orientation may be ambiguous.

H) Formal fetal mapping is important during invasive diagnosis in multiple pregnancy.

Further Reading

Navaratnam K, Alfirevic Z; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: Green-top Guideline No. 8. BJOG 2022;129:e1-e15. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16821.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
9.50
Destination
eBook
Source
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: Green-top Guideline No. 8
Source Section
Timing of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling
Source Locator
RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 8, October 2021
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question