Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q409
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 409

Pathology → General

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type SSBA
UUID 1abcb6a4-de1c-4aa2-9ad6-4d9b0353780c

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Basic
Title
Pathology
Topic
General
Subtopic 1
Neoplasia
Subtopic 2
Cancer associations
Subtopic 3
Predisposing factors
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
Several patients have chronic disorders associated with an increased risk of subsequent malignancy. Which pairing correctly matches a predisposing condition with its associated malignant transformation?
Question Stem
Select the single best answer.

Options

A Barrett oesophagus — oesophageal malignancy
B Ulcerative colitis — hepatocellular carcinoma
C Atrophic gastritis — mesothelioma
D Actinic keratosis — ovarian carcinoma
E Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia — pancreatic carcinoma

Explanation

Barrett oesophagus is a recognised predisposing condition for subsequent oesophageal malignancy. Other premalignant or predisposing conditions are similarly associated with characteristic subsequent tumours.

Option Validity

B) Ulcerative colitis predisposes to colorectal malignancy rather than hepatocellular carcinoma.

C) Atrophic gastritis is associated with gastric malignancy rather than mesothelioma.

D) Actinic keratosis predisposes to squamous cell carcinoma rather than ovarian carcinoma.

E) Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia predisposes to cervical carcinoma rather than pancreatic carcinoma.

Further Reading

Saxena R. Textbook for MRCOG-1. Chapter 5: Pathology. General Pathology, pp.161–175.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
5.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
Saxena - MRCOG-1 Basic Sciences - General Pathology
Source Section
Predisposing Factors for Cancer
Source Locator
Chapter 5, p.170
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question