Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q64
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 64

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type SSBA
UUID e0730ce8-1aee-4281-ad24-a893eff46634

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
General
Subtopic 3
Assessment
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A 32-year-old woman at 34 weeks presents with painless vaginal bleeding. She is haemodynamically stable and the fetal heart rate is normal. The placental location has not previously been documented. Which examination should be avoided until placenta praevia has been excluded?
Question Stem
—

Options

A Abdominal palpation
B Maternal blood pressure measurement
C Speculum examination
D Digital vaginal examination
E Assessment of uterine tone

Explanation

When placenta praevia is possible, digital vaginal examination should not be performed until ultrasound has excluded it because digital examination can precipitate severe haemorrhage from a placenta covering or close to the cervical os. A speculum examination can be useful for identifying lower genital tract causes of bleeding and assessing cervical dilatation when clinically appropriate. Abdominal examination remains important for assessing tenderness, uterine tone and fetal presentation.

Option Validity

A) . abdominal examination forms part of APH assessment.

B) . maternal haemodynamic assessment is essential.

C) . speculum examination may be useful and is distinct from digital examination.

E) . assessment of uterine tone may provide important evidence of placental abruption.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question