Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q65
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 65

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination eBook
Type SSBA
UUID 15a7e5a7-aab0-4764-b255-bbfe7bf72acf

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
General
Subtopic 3
Rhesus prophylaxis
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
An RhD-negative woman at 31 weeks presents with a significant antepartum haemorrhage. She has no anti-D antibodies. Which investigation is specifically required to determine whether additional anti-D immunoglobulin is necessary?
Question Stem
—

Options

A Direct antiglobulin test
B Kleihauer test
C Coagulation screen
D Serum fibrinogen
E Placental ultrasound

Explanation

In a non-sensitised RhD-negative woman with APH, the Kleihauer test is used to quantify fetomaternal haemorrhage and thereby determine whether additional anti-D immunoglobulin is required beyond the standard dose. Importantly, the test is not useful for diagnosing placental abruption. Other blood investigations may be necessary according to the severity of haemorrhage but do not quantify fetomaternal haemorrhage for anti-D dosing.

Option Validity

A) . this does not quantify fetomaternal haemorrhage for anti-D dosing.

C) . coagulation testing assesses haemostatic disturbance.

D) . fibrinogen helps assess coagulopathy rather than fetomaternal haemorrhage.

E) . ultrasound assesses placental location and fetal factors but cannot determine anti-D dose.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
eBook
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question