Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q79
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 79

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination Site
Type SSBA
UUID 4e678866-242e-41a5-992f-ec8ff143db1b

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
Placental abruption
Subtopic 3
Assessment
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A woman at 34 weeks presents with vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain. Which abdominal finding most strongly supports placental abruption rather than placenta praevia?
Question Stem
—

Options

A Soft non-tender uterus
B High presenting part
C Transverse fetal lie
D Tense tender uterus
E Easily palpable fetal parts

Explanation

Placental abruption classically presents with abdominal pain and uterine tenderness, and the uterus may become tense or “woody” when the abruption is significant. Placenta praevia more typically causes painless bleeding and may be associated with malpresentation or a high presenting part. Clinical findings are important because placental abruption is principally a clinical diagnosis and may occur despite non-diagnostic ultrasound findings.

Option Validity

A) a soft non-tender uterus is less characteristic of placental abruption.

B) a high presenting part can occur with placenta praevia and does not specifically support abruption.

C) transverse lie is associated with abnormal placental location rather than being a characteristic sign of abruption.

E) easily palpable fetal parts do not provide the characteristic evidence of uterine irritability and tenderness seen with abruption.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
Site
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question