Skip to content
MEO NextGenDeveloper StudioDEV
  1. Dashboard
  2. Questions
  3. SBA
  4. Q80
SBA

SBA — Single Best Answer · Review

Question 80

Delivery suite → Haemorrhage

NextGen Workflow Status Needs Review
SQL status generated
Destination eBook
Type SSBA
UUID dee33426-55f6-4943-800a-84a8f7ce7680

Classification

Speciality
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Group
Clinical
Title
Delivery suite
Topic
Haemorrhage
Subtopic 1
Antepartum haemorrhage
Subtopic 2
General
Subtopic 3
Intrapartum care
Question Type
SBA

Question

SSBA
Question Header
A woman at 39 weeks with a history of antepartum haemorrhage enters spontaneous labour. She has a further episode of vaginal bleeding during labour. Maternal observations are stable. What is the most appropriate method of fetal monitoring?
Question Stem
—

Options

A Intermittent auscultation every 30 minutes
B Maternal perception of fetal movements alone
C Continuous electronic fetal monitoring
D Admission CTG followed by no further monitoring if normal
E Ultrasound assessment every two hours instead of CTG

Explanation

Active vaginal bleeding during labour represents an increased risk to fetal wellbeing and continuous electronic fetal monitoring is appropriate. APH may reflect placental pathology and can be associated with acute fetal compromise. A reassuring initial trace does not remove the need for ongoing surveillance while the clinical risk persists. Intermittent auscultation is therefore inadequate in the presence of active intrapartum bleeding.

Option Validity

A) intermittent auscultation is insufficient when active APH creates an ongoing risk of fetal compromise.

B) maternal perception of fetal movement cannot replace intrapartum fetal heart monitoring.

D) a normal admission CTG does not eliminate the continuing risk associated with active bleeding.

E) intermittent ultrasound is not a substitute for continuous electronic fetal monitoring during labour.

Further Reading

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 63. Antepartum Haemorrhage. 2011.

Source & metrics

Authored Difficulty
4.00
Evaluation Score
—
Destination
eBook
Source
—
Source Section
—
Source Locator
—
Updated
2026-10-06 01:57:35
Difficulty Factor
Not available yet
Attended Users
No candidate-attempt data yet
Review Question